I’ve been talking to a few action companies about building a custom action to my specs.
I get 2-3 calls a week from folks asking what action l’d recommend for their first custom rifle build. Truth is-l usually don’t know how to answer that, because I’m just as undecided as everyone else.
Brand doesn’t mean much to me. I’m more of a function/feature and fit/finish guy.
Action Features:
60° or 75° bolt throw Mechanical ejection (no spring-loaded plungers) Vertical controlled round feed Toolless bolt disassembly Third lug orientation: Lug must point up. When it points down (like Aero’s), it removes too much material from the feed ramp-which causes long, skinny .22-cal bullets to slam into the breech
Construction Preferences:
Integrated recoil lug Pinned scope rail with swappable MOA options (thermal hunters will appreciate this) Headspace tight enough to support pre-fit barrels Enlarged loading port for easy single-round top One-piece bolt (floating heads tend to bind)
Since the release of the New 25 Creedmoor. I took a minute to compile all the Factory Creedmoor Data from Hornady to compare them.
I thought it was a new fad but the numbers are pretty impressive. (BC), Hornady muzzle velocities, drop, wind drift, and recoil in a 10-lb rifle from 100-1,000 yards.
Cartridge Specs
.22 Creedmoor: 80 gr ELD-M, BC 0.485, 3,300 fps 6mm Creedmoor: 103 gr ELD-X, BC 0.512, 2,955 fps 25 Creedmoor*: 134 gr ELD-M, BC 0.645, 2,850 fps (est.) 6.5 Creedmoor: 143 gr ELD-X, BC 0.625, 2,700 fps
*Note: 25 Creedmoor is a wildcat; velocity estimated. Ballistic Performance (Drop/Wind Drift in inches, 10 mph crosswind)
Carbon Fiber has to be the most miserable, itchy, dusty, corrosive and dirty thing to machine that exists.
Change My Mind!
Before and after the 6 hour clean up
While carbon can be and HAS BEEN a pain. You can’t argue with the sleek finished product that has the added bonus of a barrel stronger than your stainless steel counterparts.